Sugar Baby, Lauren Silverman, Could Get Charged $50,000 Just For Dating Simon Cowell

Lauren Silverman Charged $50,000 Sugar Daddy Simon CowellNew details have sur­faced about the divorce agree­ment between Lau­ren Sil­ver, Simon Cowell’s younger baby mama and now girl­friend, and her ex-husband, Andrew Silverman—and it has a lot to do with Cowell’s role in the dis­so­lu­tion of their marriage.

As you prob­a­bly recall, Mr. Sil­ver­man and Cow­ell were good friends, until Cow­ell was caught hav­ing an affair with his friend’s wife. She got preg­nant with Cowell’s baby while she was still mar­ried. Her hus­band quickly pro­ceeded with fil­ing the divorce papers, and a set­tle­ment was reached not too long after. The for­mer cou­ple wanted to keep the pro­ceed­ings as short as pos­si­ble for the sake of their seven-year-old son. Although the divorce was said to be as ami­ca­ble as pos­si­ble, given the cir­cum­stances, these new details of their set­tle­ment prove oth­er­wise, espe­cially when it comes to his ex-wife’s cur­rent May-December rela­tion­ship with Cowell.

The scorned hus­band has gone so far as to add a clause in their divorce set­tle­ment that bans Cow­ell from going any­where near their son, and if he vio­lates it, she’ll have to fork over a whop­ping $50,000 to her ex-husband. If Sil­ver­man and her celebrity sugar daddy vio­late the clause three times, she’ll no longer be allowed to con­tact her son until it’s dealt with in court.

That’s not all. Cowell’s sugar baby also got her say in the mat­ter by adding a clause of her own: her ex-husband report­edly isn’t allowed to bad­mouth her new man to their son, and he’s also legally oblig­ated to make sure no one else does either.

The anti-Cowell clause is only valid until Jan­u­ary 2015, but it’s still a big blow to Silverman’s new May-December rela­tion­ship with Cow­ell because, once their baby is born in Feb­ru­ary of next year, she’ll be forced to split her time between her son and her new fam­ily with Cowell.

Believe it or not, there’s another strange twist to this celebrity story. Sil­ver­man and her ex-husband have decided to forgo the involve­ment of lawyers in future dis­putes, agree­ing instead to use medi­a­tors. They’ve decided on two, and one of them is bil­lion­aire Top­shop owner Sir Phillip Green, who is a mutual friend of the Sil­ver­mans. Green is report­edly the one who first intro­duced Cow­ell and Mr. Sil­ver­man. Besides being close to both par­ties, Green is no stranger to the com­pli­ca­tions of May-December relationships—his own 22-year-old daugh­ter, Chloe, is dat­ing 45-year-old singer Marc Anthony.

What do you think: Is the Sil­ver­mans’ agree­ment to keep Simon Cow­ell away from their kid rea­son­able, or unfair?

Sources:

“Simon Cow­ell – Lauren’s Divorce Set­tle­ment: Simon, Stay Away From Her Son…Or Else!” TMZ web site, Novem­ber 14, 2013; http://goo.gl/E0GT2X.

“Simon Cowell’s Baby Mama – Screw Lawyers…I Got a Bil­lion­aire Divorce Medi­a­tor,” TMZ web site, Novem­ber 14, 2013; http://goo.gl/NEjhhb.

Photo Credit: Fea­ture­flash / Shutterstock.com